SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Diamond Jim who wrote (84167)12/24/1999 11:16:00 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574127
 
yep Jimbo,
iNhEL pushing the envelope on vapor launches.
Maybe Barrett can pump up the stock a little bit more before he dumps his 400k shares?

Merry Christmas DELL!

Make it so,
Mysef



To: Diamond Jim who wrote (84167)12/28/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574127
 
ouch

Early Tests: Athlon-800 vs. PIII-750

PC WorldBench scores find the first 800-MHz Athlon system slightly trails Intel's Pentium III-750.

by Tom Mainelli, PC World
December 27, 1999, 1:00 p.m. PT
Advanced Micro Devices won't officially announce its 800-MHz Athlon chip until early January, but we've already tested an upcoming Polywell PC running the new processor. The first word: The new system scored ever-so-slightly lower in our PC WorldBench 98 than a comparably configured 750-MHz Pentium III reference system.

The Polywell Poly 800K7-800 includes AMD's Athlon-800, 512KB of L2 cache, 128MB of SDRAM, a 27.3GB hard drive, a 6X DVD-ROM drive, a 4X AGP graphics with 32MB of video memory, a V.90 modem, a 100MB Zip drive, a 19-inch monitor, Windows 98 Second Edition, and Lotus SmartSuite.

Customers can configure the Polywell system to their taste; the PC we tested is priced at $2800. Polywell is already taking orders for the Athlon-800 PC on its Web site and by phone. Company executives say they expect to begin shipping the 800-MHz systems after January 10, and plan to offer a Pentium III-800 system soon after that.

Close Scores, Who'd Notice?

Intel beat AMD out of the gate with its Pentium III-800, announced on December 20, but we still haven't tested an 800-MHz PIII system (stay tuned). So we opted to compare the 800-MHz Polywell unit to a comparably configured PIII-750 reference system and the combined average of an AMD-built Athlon-750 reference box and a preproduction Compaq Presario running a PIII-750.

The Intel-built PIII-750 reference PC came with 256KB of L2 cache, 128MB of Rambus memory, 32MB of video memory, and a 17GB hard drive. The AMD-built Athlon-750 system came with 512KB of L2 cache, 128MB of SDRAM memory, 32MB of video memory, and a 20GB hard drive. Both reference machines were running Windows 98, and neither is on the market.

The 750-MHz Presario 5900Z has 128MB of SDRAM, a 34GB hard drive, both DVD-ROM and CD-RW drives, 32MB of video memory, and a 19-inch monitor. Its street price is $3456. Compaq includes antivirus and support software that tend to slow down performance, and the Presario's numbers lowered the average of the two 750-MHz Athlon machines a bit.

That said, the PC WorldBench 98 results for all three processors were quite good, and very close. The PIII-750 posted the highest PC WorldBench 98 score of the three at 315; the 800-MHz Athlon landed a score of 309. That's a virtually imperceptible difference of less than 2 percent. Of the 750-MHz Athlon systems, the AMD reference system scored 305 and the Presario, 289. Those, too are barely noticeable differences: The reference system is 3 percent slower than the 750-MHz PIII and the Presario is 8 percent slower. All of these differences are slight, especially when based on such a small set of test machines.

So could most PC users tell the difference between a system with the PIII-750 and the Athlon-800? No. Does that matter to performance-minded buyers willing to pay top dollar for the "fastest" PC on the market, and the bragging rights (however short-lived) that accompany it? Probably not.