Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (46315)	12/26/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: Ironyman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116978

Rarebird,,, Yes...This will end badly! I compare this to the railroad wars of the 1800's, where blackmail actually occurred, whereby groups would demand payments from an existing railroad or they would construct a competing one. The real stupid thing is that most of the "E" stocks don't even have paying passengers. ....The reality is that there is inflation and YHOO has a P/E of 1600. It is very obvious that gold is worth much more than 288.00. ....ABX thinks we are stupid when they said that hedging doesn't effect the POG. Their own company president quit earlier this year! Peter Monk thinks that he is god...LOL...so did Ceasar! Irony Man

To: Rarebird who wrote (46315)	12/26/1999 10:21:00 PM
From: Enigma	Respond to of 116978

Well I agree with you about the thread - but I think hedging practice simply recognises variation in future prices whether it involves grain or metals. In other words the producer has no 'view' on what the price will be in future - but this is a far cry, as some claim, that a particular producer wants the price of the commodity to fall. This flies in the face of intelligent thought. This is the opposite from the truth - but what we are dealing with here, on this thread from a group of posters is religion - and it's fruitless to argue with people about their faith - even if the faith is flawed and bad. Any contrary view or request for proof results in shrieks of pain.

To: Rarebird who wrote (46315)	12/27/1999 5:34:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116978

(Personal Attack) Rarebird, in my opinion you have always posted on this thread in a buffoonery manner, but this last post of yours shows a change, as in a de-evolve'ation on your part. Clear to me why Bobby always considered your posts superior to others. Please take this as helpful advice, not the (Personal Attack) label on this post, which is untrue. I have some texts on Logic at the advanced level, but first you would have to do an introduction one, and then work up from there before using mine. Helpful Doug