SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : RealNetworks (NASDAQ:RNWK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Goodboy who wrote (4733)12/27/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: Scott C. Lemon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5843
 
Hello Goodboy,

I agree that Servers and Players will move more and more to a "free" or "Open Source" model. But as I have recently been looking at this, it appears that the business model that arises is not so different from the one that we have.

In a "Open Source" model, the "customer" can get the product for "free", but this does not represent a complete model. Because they are then left with one of three (maybe more?) choices ...

1. They hire an in-house development staff to support the code and any problems that occur. (Remember that a bug which causes the server to crash will have to be fixed very quickly!)

2. They could rely on the "Open Source" community to beg for fixes, or limit the expansion of their services to the rate at which the free-workers decide to implement code.

3. They could pay the original vendor to support the code and innovate with new features! This is a possible outcome that I am really starting to like ... it appears that this is then a "best of both worlds" scenario ... the customer gets the product and code for free, but then pays (or "outsources") the support and enhancements. If the vendor provides the best support and enhancements, then they still get paid ... if the customer finds another source for better support and enhancements, then they migrate their "business" to that vendor.

Of course there could be variations on this ... but I see something like this unfolding with people like VA Linux, etc.

Just an opinion/speculation ...

Scott C. Lemon



To: Goodboy who wrote (4733)12/27/1999 7:11:00 PM
From: Tony Wang  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5843
 
RNWK is in the major buy zone. This doubt about RNWK
will pass. All stocks have corrections. And in corrections there is always a story to give a reason to explain the weakness; ie: MSFT and its court case, and
how open archtecture of the Linux will kill Microsoft.
Now 30 pts higher at 119, that story is history and irrelevant. The same will occur with RNWK. It is the weak hands that are selling out now.