To: hcirteg who wrote (17297 ) 12/27/1999 4:16:00 PM From: John Curtis Respond to of 27311
HC, et.al.: LOL! I would suggest keeping that crystal ball allllll to yerself. At least until you reach Bill Gates threshold of gain. After all...why sell a system until you've gotten YOUR'S.....But even so, with so many folks now using TA, etc., you'd think there'd be more successes out there in cyberspace. But there aren't...and this probably has something to do with the diminishing returns associated with everyone using the same tool. That is, in the attempt by everyone to make the market more rational, they in fact make it even less so...... Speaking of diminishing returns, yield of product, etc.....well....hmm....Zeev makes some points, and it's certainly good to remain cautious, but still, you've got to figure VLNC's got the yield issue well in hand. They've already had, some time ago, their catastrophic occurrance in the form of their last attempt in '94 with MOT. Me thinks management has insured VLNC won't be repeating THAT experience. But regarding yields....well....they certainly will not be releasing any information in this area, as it'd betray their hand to the competition. But a $32 Million vote of confidence bepeaks the obvious with regards to VLNC's capabilities as judged by those who have the wherewithall to determine allll they need to assuage any concerns. And since the market knows all, and is currently voting its opinion by way of a very nice, steady rise in VLNC valuation ....well....I'd like to think the odds are diminishingly small we'll see VLNC south of $20 again. At least...not without a split or two.....HEH! And WHAT a thought a split is, eh? Uhh....of course, this is imho. ;-) John~