To: Rambi who wrote (68919 ) 12/27/1999 6:49:00 PM From: greenspirit Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
Rambi, this summary clip from that link says what I have been trying to say since the beginning of this discussion. Until the public truly understand that the structure of an organization determines it's long term success or failure. The chances of serious systemic improvements in our government education system are next-to-nill. What can be done? Structurally change the system by implementing a voucher program or charter school concept. The Edison examples Lizzie showed us should be benchmarked as an example of what can be done when you change the structure. So, you first must start with education and dialogue. In order to have that you need leaders willing to look for different answers than than the tired old cliche's "We need more money". Unfortunately, we have few leaders in politics today with real vision. Perhaps George W will provide that leadership. We shall see. Other than that, the initiative process in many states in another option. Unfortunately, the last time a vote was held here in state of washington the voucher concept lost out by a slim minority. It's tough to win a vote when the NEA and teachers union spends millions upon millions of dollars running fear campaigns against the initiative. But the tide is moving steadily in favor of voucher and charter schools. So I have little doubt it will win a vote at some point in the future. ___________________________________________________________ <<<<The Kansas City experiment suggests that, indeed, educational problems can't be solved by throwing money at them, that the structural problems of our current educational system are far more important than a lack of material resources, and that the focus on desegregation diverted attention from the real problem, low achievement.>>>