SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: voop who wrote (173)12/27/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: Thomas J. Smith  Respond to of 8096
 
ROBV



To: voop who wrote (173)12/27/1999 7:02:00 PM
From: taxman  Respond to of 8096
 
puts are protection against a down market. you can buy puts with at least a six to nine months duration and in some cases out to 2002 so you don't have to do it every month. in any event for me having some puts is safer than being 100% long. actually there is no cost for me as i have made money on my puts in spite of a bull market. in addition, having puts relieves stress when the market turns down and helps to avoid making rash emotional decisions. as for puts being expensive--they are not. as you recently pointed out aol had a 50% drop within just a couple of months--and that was without a bear market.

i generally consider the term "naked puts" as one who is short, rather than long, the put.

regards



To: voop who wrote (173)12/27/1999 9:09:00 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 8096
 
Voop,

Oh gosh, I just have to say this:

If you go outside without your pajamas on, wouldn't that be a naked putz, not naked puts?

OK, God, strike me dead.....