SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (57023)12/27/1999 8:51:00 PM
From: Jeffry K. Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Greg, thanks so much for that link! Never knew what 3G meant until reading the article. (afraid to ask).

Jeff Smith



To: Boplicity who wrote (57023)12/27/1999 9:55:00 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Thx again Greg......you keep posting this stuff I "Might" get educated
T



To: Boplicity who wrote (57023)12/27/1999 10:59:00 PM
From: quartersawyer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
"here is an good primer on the 3G"--not really. In fact, that's very flawed information. Long story short: H&Q's skewed report touting GPRS/Edge upgrades to existing GSM systems fails to account for the reality that costs of moving data on those systems will be (if ever) uncompetitive. Contracts for new systems, from scratch, are being signed (example: One.Tel/Lucent for Western Europe.)This is in direct contradiction to H&Q's report that the inefficient GSM upgrades will be sufficient to block new systems. Clearly if a more effective and more efficient system exists within a competitive field it will eventually take all the business. H&Q continues to defend the indefensible in kind of an entertaining way, but you have to have followed the act for a year to understand how totally wrong they continue to be like right now about 1000 bucks a share off! Good going Hambrecht! Hey Quist, keep up the nice work! Sheesh.