Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (69041)	12/28/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Puhleeze. You keep changing the subject. Bubba wasn't impeached for turning the Oval Office into a whorehouse. The sex was not the point. He was impeached for subverting a judicial proceeding, perjury, obstruction, etc. NONEof the prior occupants of the WH have lied under oath in a judicial proceeding or at the very least none were caught redhanded and irrefutably as Clintonocchio was. None of the prior occupants of the WH has ever been fined for contempt of Court. Even Nixon, as crooked as he was, had the dignity to resign. You know that but as a blind partisan you can not accept it. Your post entirely fails to justify the smear you made on the Bushes or how your ramblings relate to the earlier smear you made on all males (or 90% anyway). Why am I not surprised? JLA

To: lorrie coey who wrote (69041)	12/28/1999 3:12:00 PM
From: Edwarda	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

The Precedent had been set long ago...Presidents past have had extra-marital "relations"...and not even been asked to justify it. Can you produce an instance of a previous president's perjury about a his extramarital activities? And what has this topic to do with the "maleness" issue, which seems to have been swept aside?