Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Quote.com QCharts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paulr1 who wrote (5123)	12/28/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: jebj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17977

>But at the rate the markets are growing we may find in two or so years 256 isn't enough anymore and we'll need 512 or some such feed to handle all the data. Wasn't too long ago the 9600 baud was sufficient for all market data, after all. - Paulrl Two years from now there will not be any 256K feeds any more - we are right on the edge of a major explosion in data feed and what we see today will not even be in the marketplace any more. jb

To: paulr1 who wrote (5123)	12/29/1999 9:59:00 AM
From: Esteban	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17977

There's been some discussion on another thread about the volume on the S&P e-mini contract. Cme:ES00h. Seems that all of us using Qcharts show all trade sizes in T&S as 1, and all volume bars in charts as number of trades rather than volume of contracts. Checking the delayed full contract SP00h, I see the same thing, a count of trades rather than a report of the volume. Would you please comment on this. I would assume it's because I don't pay a CME exchange fee, except that one of the contributors to the other thread does pay the fee through QCharts, and he gets the same result as everyone else. I would pay the fee if I could get the volume. Esteban