Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lola who wrote (1419)	12/28/1999 8:23:00 PM
From: Buckey	Respond to of 1996

I disagree - that he should post that info - on the bottom of the screen - THis is the only thread I know of he posts DD on and he has done it for a lonmg time - Obvioulsy he is into it BIG TIME. IF he is an insider - WE need our anonymity for a whole slew of reasons and that MUST be respected - some work will reveal many of our identities if we really want to work at it - Even ole MM - Mr Metals is known to many but I think that peice is necessary - That is MHO only

To: Lola who wrote (1419)	12/28/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1996

Well i disagree quite strongly. Nobody ever went to jail for not disclosing a PP participation. Perhaps you were thinking of something else. There are a number of levels of participation in companies, and PPs rank rather low on the spectrum. I have participated in PPs, though not since posting on the internet. One of the reasons i don't pursue leads to PPs now is that my name would be posted in bloody Stockwatch, let alone the internet at large. You're right, we should trust no one on the internet. For that reason i consider it strongly inadvisable to post one's name unless and until it is absolutely necessary, such as for insiders. The Chief has posted clearly that he holds what he considers for him a sizable position in Rock. Whether or not he got some in a PP is irrelevant, imho. If fuddle really wanted an answer instead of just wanting to nip the ankles of a poster who consistently picks better stocks, he would have PMed him. That he chose the route he did is clearly a reflection on fuddle, who should imho grab a clue. Now maybe i express that a little harshly, but like you say - Trust no one here.