SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bobby beara who wrote (36159)12/29/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
BB, JCP is bottoming out those days. Worth accumulating.

BWDIK
Haim



To: bobby beara who wrote (36159)12/29/1999 1:23:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Bobby, i called MO a screaming buy on the myth thread this morning...i only fear that a popping of the bubble segment will lead to even lower prices for the low priced stocks. p/e's of 3 or 4 are not out of the question...
otoh, my expectation is that there will be a rotation from the over- into the undervalued sectors early next year first.

hb



To: bobby beara who wrote (36159)12/29/1999 1:40:00 PM
From: theRedDog  Respond to of 99985
 
>>>>>>
....................
and mo is yielding 8+%.
and nobody wants em.
<<<<<<<

OK. I'm coming out of the closet. :>

I'm actively buying MAR, JUN, JAN2001, and JAN2002 MO Calls.

FWIW the rationale goes like this:

MO is at about 23 and way oversold. When the tax selling abates MO should have a spike back to around 36 (or at least 28) where it was for most of the year.

Later in the year it should do well as the Republican candidates manage to keep their (perceived by me) advantage.

MO should raise with a Republican president, or if anything happens that clarifies MO's situation. (Final settlement, break-up, etc.)

OTOH, if there's a market crash it shouldn't affect MO much because it has already crashed.

BWDIK?

theRedDog.

PS: No political discussion, please.



To: bobby beara who wrote (36159)12/29/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: dennis michael patterson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
b, is there any way to describe the action in Q other than "nuts"??? From London, this looks good!