Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (64331)	12/29/1999 3:58:00 PM
From: Scarecrow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

"I did not have sexual relations [I-N-T-E-R-C-O-U-R-S-E], with that Woman...Ms. Lewinsky." That's your interpretation, not mine nor virtually anyone else's. Parse away -- it doesn't change the truth. Now, I believe Thomas lied. Without any confirming proof that he lied, you believe that Clarence Thomas lied. Without any confirming proof that she lied, you believe that Juanita Broadrick lied. WITH confirming proof that he lied (and mountains of it -- in numerous issues -- just as Susan Wright Weber), you believe that Bill Clinton told the truth. Whew. Thank goodness you're here to set us all straight on that. "So to recap: admit to a BJ in the Oval Office -- that's private." -Consentual [sic] sex in the OO, [as if it's some Temple of Celibacy], IS the sign of a healthy libido. And, if I had asked whether it was a sign of a healthy libido, that would have been a relevant answer. However, that's not the statement/question I posed, is it? I asked if that's private. We are all too painfully aware of Mr. Clinton's clinically hyperactive libido. He can seek treatment elsewhere and we can leave that discussion for another time (read: NEVER). "Rent a porno flick on your own time at home -- that's not private." -Having to get your erotic needs met by a VideoCassette IS the sign of a Repressed, denial-based, objectifying, unhealthy libido. Ahh, libel. s'pity that Thomas is a public figure... And of course, when Bill Clinton has phone sex, that is NOT, of course, "the sign of a Repressed, denial-based, objectifying, unhealthy libido..." No, that's a healthy thing... And of course, you again evade the issue and distract to something that's not even worth discussing... If WJC knew that the phones were "tapped" and therefore, not "private", I'm sure he was just deliberately giving the eavesdroppers a Thrill! Thank goodness you're sure. I mean, you'd know, right? Are you sure he wasn't trying to show them signs of "a Repressed, denial-based, objectifying, unhealthy libido"? After all, you're our expert in these matters... I think PORNSTARR & Co. were the "foreign agents". Thanks for the meaningless non sequitir... The only thing more hyperactive than Clinton's libido are your pathetically illogical attempts to rationalize the indefensible. Dialoging with you and responding to your "arguments and logic" (how I hate to use those terms in connection with your posts) is like shooting fish in a barrel: harmlessly amusing, unchallenging, and ultimately unsatisfying at any level... Do enjoy your semi-lucid New Year.