SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: George Papadopoulos who wrote (15629)12/30/1999 9:50:00 AM
From: MNI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
>>that Kohl violated German law for receiving these contributions >>
right
>>and preparations are underway to charge him >>
right
>>therefore he would have to reveal the sources sooner or later >>
only so-so right.

Kohl was always anxious to make sure that no 'fishy allusions', directed either legally or morally, would taint his public image. In that way he was actually a totalitarian. However he has proven to be immensely stable and resolved in resistance. So even if he was legally in no position at all to stay silent, he might personally choose to do so.
Additionally it has already been cleared that a former threat of the Parlamentary President to allow Kohl to be taken to jail to make him talk will never be brought to reality (the President, Thierse, himself known for good conduct, has asked Kohl's pardon for that threat).

It is therefore conceivable that Kohl stays put for a decade or more simply by exacting a strong will.

On the other hand, it is incalculable whether his party will be more damaged by him staying with the present tactics or by an eventual publication of the silent contributors and their reasons. It depends on who they are and where the money came from, and that is information Kohl seems to have (almost) alone so he is the only one to decide.

The party (with few exceptions) urges him to speak, and the younger and the eastern members are even very outspoken about that.
The tabloid conservative BILD, the biggest impact factor on the silent majority, supported Kohl to stay silent ('gentlemen don't talk').

Up to now polls have shown that the electoral majority doesn't take the matter so serious in their evaluation of Kohl as a person, as a historic chancellor, as a party chief and so on, but quite serious in their comparative evaluation of Schroeder as a chancellor (hence, the magic interview brought here by goldsnow), of Kohl's party and of Schroeder's party. Therefore I should think that while up to the Kohl scandal the chances for winning the pivotal state elections in Schleswig-Holstein (February 27) for CDU and SPD were equal, it is now a 60:40 chance pro SPD.

In any case, I think talking any later than the second week of January will do more harm to Kohl's party than talking earlier, and only a realistic hope to take the secret to his grave can really be the reason not to talk now.
But I have thought so in other situations before, and Kohl has always outmastered me both in procrastination and in finding positive side-effects of it.

Regards MNI.



To: George Papadopoulos who wrote (15629)12/30/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: Apex  Respond to of 17770
 
Y2K is going to be a very busy year...

==================
Wars Rage in Third of World Nations 

By Tom Raum
Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, Dec. 29, 1999; 3:35 p.m. EST

WASHINGTON –– The century is coming to a close with a third of the
world's 193 nations embroiled in conflict, nearly twice the Cold War level,
a group that keeps track of battle zones reported Wednesday.

In its annual report, the National Defense Council Foundation blamed
rising military coups and a backlash against democracy, a trend it
suggested could continue for several years.

The foundation listed 65 conflicts in 1999, up from 60 the year before. It
nominated Afghanistan as the world's most unstable state for 2000 –
followed closely by Somalia, Iraq, Angola and the breakaway Chechnya
region of Russia.

"It's going to be a very tough next 20 years," retired Army Maj. Andy
Messing Jr., executive director of the Alexandria, Va.-based foundation,
said in an interview. He said the growing proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction and an increasing world population add to the danger.

Seventeen countries were added to the list this year, and 12 were
removed – including two with authoritarian governments, Cuba and Libya.
They were removed in light of reduced terrorist violence against President
Fidel Castro's Cuban government and Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's
"strong control over the country," the report said.

Although the number of wars and regional conflicts was up from a year
ago, it was below the record 71 the organization counted in 1995. By
contrast, the average in the late 1980s, near the end of the Cold War, was
about 35.

"The bipolar 'Cold War' system has disintegrated into a system of 'Warm
Wars,' with randomized conflicts popping up in all corners of an
interdependent world," the report said.

It cited a recent erosion of democratic advances, including military coups
in Guinea-Bissau, Pakistan, Niger and Comoros and a slide back toward
authoritarianism in Venezuela, Russia and Haiti.

"This 'reverse wave' could continue for several years and lead to a
long-term rise in conflict," the report said.

The list included cross-border wars, such as between Ethiopia and
Eritrea; and civil wars such as those in Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Sudan and
the Democratic Republic of Congo. It also included major insurgencies.

Russia made the list because of separatist wars in Chechnya and its
neighbor to the east, Dagestan, terrorism and organized crime activity.
China was included based on "political turmoil," the Beijing government's
crackdown on religious dissidents and tensions over Taiwan and the
Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.

Kosovo and East Timor, where international military intervention was used
to end internal violence and human-rights violations, were among places
added to the list.

The foundation, aligned with political conservatives who advocate
increased spending on defense, lists countries where turmoil has disrupted
economies, politics or security.

Its count differs from a more modest one maintained by the Central
Intelligence Agency.

CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield said the CIA list, which is classified,
currently counts 31 conflicts.

Still, "there continues to be significant conflicts all over the world, pointing
to the need for a robust intelligence-gathering capability," Mansfield said.

The CIA figure has remained relatively stable over several years,
Mansfield said. The last time the CIA gave a number was in 1996, when it
listed 28 conflicts.

Mansfield said the CIA counts only conflicts with "high levels of organized
violence between states or between contending groups within a state or
with high levels of political or societal tension likely to erupt into violence."

The Washington-based Center for Defense Information, a liberal-oriented
research group that has issued reports skeptical of increased military
spending, counts 37 active wars or combat zones where at least 1,000
casualties have occurred. That's up from 27 a few years back.

"There are more active conflicts today than at the end of the Cold War,"
said retired Army Col. Daniel Smith, the center's chief of research. "The
superpowers tended to move carefully and prevent client states from
getting too far out of hand."

Messing defended his foundation's more extensive listing of conflicts. "Our
report doesn't use an arbitrary threshold," he said. "We try to portray an
accurate reading of the number of conflicts."

© Copyright 1999 The Associated Press