SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: limtex who wrote (58050)12/30/1999 9:46:00 AM
From: Sawtooth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
<<Just out of interest do you remember them moaning about any other high flyers ....... Why on and on about the Q which performs today? What do they have against the Q? They seem to be ......>>

From time to time I remind myself that most of those who are aware of the Q's meteoric rise do not own any Q. No doubt many have been on the sidelines waiting for a pullback from $175 or something "long ago". It's happened to the best of us and it's never fun.

......VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV



To: limtex who wrote (58050)12/30/1999 9:58:00 AM
From: R.V.M.  Respond to of 152472
 
Aren't there tight restrictions on what CNBC-ers can buy? Maybe some are miffed that they're not on the rocket ship. I do remember Joe Kernen a couple of years ago or so, when Yahoo was 90 (split-adjusted maybe 15 or so) asking if people would buy at these levels. "I certainly wouldn't," he said.

RVM



To: limtex who wrote (58050)12/30/1999 10:25:00 AM
From: MileHigh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
L,

I do not remember them harping as much on the stocks you mention. I'll say it again, BIG NUMBERS SCARE PEOPLE, or they create drama. Also, look at valuations of JNPR, SYCM, AOL, YHOO vs QCOM!?

Oh well, enough said!

But hey, you lost me on this cryptic passage?

They seem to be upset to the point of not mentioning the MtM in MM

MH