SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Carroll who wrote (3718)12/30/1999 10:06:00 AM
From: John Solder  Respond to of 5023
 
What NOK showed is that if a company can do one thing well it can afford them an opportunity to take the risks required to hit the next product. A well run company has the R&D, market analysis, product analysis and mgmt to handle shifting product areas. IMO IOM has the engineering end of things together. The rest is chaos. I think it has to do with weak mgmt and the inability to attract quality people to Roy Utah.



To: Tom Carroll who wrote (3718)12/30/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: Naggrachi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5023
 
<<still long IOM, no position
in Nokia [unfortunately])>>

With a 3-5 year horizon, it's not too late (We've held IOM for that long, why not a quality company for a change?) With NOK, everything you've been accustomed to with IOM's managment, is the exact opposite. It's such a pleasure. Bought in '98 and have been averaging up.

Zead


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News