SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CDDD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (542)12/30/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Deeber  Respond to of 924
 
Well, looks to me like this aint no scam. It fell 20 points and came back 40. Shorts laugh and laugh...but who are the ones making the $$?? Uhhhh...the LONGS...and yes thats my final answer.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (542)12/30/1999 11:53:00 AM
From: jjs64  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 924
 
Afrayem;

I am STILL WAITING for my "Unlimited Losses" from your other OTCBB POS scam stocks, like NCDR...you failed to deliver on your promises then, and you will fail now.

Actually, since we were discussing the merits of reading well versus couting well, in order for their to be unlimited losses, the shares must go to infinity. Have any stocks EVER gone to infinity? Of that group, how many were OTCBB reverse merger POS Rene Hamouth involved ISRC, POND, CAPC traded issues, that are on the verge of delisting?

Buyer Beware!

PS. The "news" about Rene's investment was in the filing too, I noticed CDDDE's release failed to mention that Winnburn is the notorious Rene H.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (542)12/30/1999 12:08:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 924
 
Afrayem, what happened with the SEC filing showing Renee Hamouths signature. Did they forget to insert "Illegible" in its place?