SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lone Star who wrote (54013)12/30/1999 12:02:00 PM
From: BarbaraT  Respond to of 108040
 
Okay ... nibbled at IDC here ... hated missing a party.



To: Lone Star who wrote (54013)12/30/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: Walk Softly  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108040
 
IDC thought MOT ruling was tossed on appeal... the lay jurors were the ones that originally declared the patents unenforcable... the recent ruling threw out their verdict... MOT owes too...



To: Lone Star who wrote (54013)12/30/1999 12:15:00 PM
From: Maryann M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108040
 
Yeah, IDC can't go back after MOT -- a lay jury ruled in favor of MOT a couple years ago.
MOT big lawyers, uninformed-non-technical jury, and little IDC.
BTW Q paid IDC a flat fee for using 2G technology -- IDC needed the money. But now I think IDC will play differently and all will have to pay as they go with 3G.
Big $$ for IDC.
BTW Ericy would be smart to settle out of court and work with IDC going forward. We'll see.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News