SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cirruslvr who wrote (84410)12/30/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573428
 
Cringe - Re: ". Unless Cumine gets an extra 256K L2 cache, some other added features, "

Well, now you know !!!

Coppermine will have a 512K cache - coming in early 2000 !

Of course, Coppermine XEONS with 1 Meg and 2 MegaBytes L2 cache will be launched on January 18 !

Paul



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (84410)12/30/1999 2:53:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1573428
 
RE:"Even if Intel can scale Cumine to Athlon levels of 1GHz, Thunderbird should be able to outperform Cumine a good amount. Unless Cumine gets an extra 256K L2 cache, some other added features, or Camino "2" turns out to be magical, Intel will have to wait for Willy to regain a performance lead over Thunderbird, assuming Willy can really leap."

Intel hasn't built a new core in 6 years. Even a revamped P6, the Flopper, was a tough launch. So how do you think the Willemena launch will be? <G>




To: Cirruslvr who wrote (84410)12/30/1999 5:23:00 PM
From: DRBES  Respond to of 1573428
 
Question to the thread as a whole. Given what I see coming over the horizon (not far away at all.)

Is there any soothe to the rumor that inteL's final weapon is to buy up as many AMD chips as it can and repackage them as the pee iiIF?

Regards,

DARBES