SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Incyte (INCY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pam3001 who wrote (1280)1/2/2000 4:54:00 AM
From: Doc Bones  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3202
 
After the breakout in Celera following "The Motley Fool's" high-profile purchase, The Fool said:

fool.com

The Celera buy announcement has touched off something of a firestorm, even by past Motley Fool standards. The stock traded 1.695 million shares on Friday, an all-time record. Since then, in just 3 days, the stock has been halted in trading more than once, and is up more than 60%. This is not a micro cap. This is a multibillion-dollar enterprise at the forefront of a revolution most of the world knows little about. It's like the Internet back in 1993.

The Celera story is now hitting the mainstream media's radar. And I'm giggling. Why? Because Reuters didn't know what was happening, nor did The New York Stock Exchange, which asked the company for some comment or explanation. Bloomberg thought it must be a one-line mention in a New York Times article earlier this week, quickly agreed to by a (Wise?) fellow from BancBoston. Even a Foolish chappy, Joe Kernan, sat on the air on CNBC yesterday and said he could find nothing to account for all this.

Are the mainstream media still not using the online medium? You be the judge.


**********

The follow-up to the chest thumping on the Fool's ability to move markets was We don't care. - because we're longterm investors...

They might have cared a little that the original announcement was that they would invest $50,000 in Celera over the next 5 business days, and so they had to pay a pretty penny for that market influence.

I believe The Fool is right that they were the biggest influence on that rapid run-up of Celera.

However The Celera story is now hitting the mainstream media's radar. And I'm giggling. has me giggling a bit too. I feel I've been pummeled by the Celera-Venter story in the mainstream media over many months, certainly in the New York Times, which has given it rather more than a one-line mention. (Wish I'd payed more heed.)

It seems that both the mainstream media and the online medium are guilty of ignoring the other.

Doc



To: pam3001 who wrote (1280)1/2/2000 3:47:00 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 3202
 
<Following my impulse to consolidate in gorillas, I have bulked up cra holdings, selling hgsi and others to do so. Short term that has worked out well for me, but I am wondering if anyone has an opinion as to true primacy of cra over others.>

You are right to wonder... IMO there is no one winner here, there's too much IP spread out among the players. The gene race isn't a Gorilla Game [the chips ala AFFX may be?] IMO.

DAK