SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Logain Ablar who wrote (72592)12/31/1999 9:42:00 AM
From: Les H  Respond to of 132070
 
There's also a lot of variance in incomes by region, especially when there are depressed sectors such as agriculture, energy, and minerals, in those poorer regions. On the other extreme, you still only need to earn $ 3000 a year in income to qualify to receive social security and medicare.

The other side of the net wealth equation is the high level of debt. When the equity held in personal residences keeps declining each year and most cars are now leased not owned, is it any wonder. Most people don't own the new cars they're driving around in.

Income redistribution doesn't work as long as people give money away to the newly minted stocks with no earnings, negative cash flow, and miniscule sales.



To: Logain Ablar who wrote (72592)12/31/1999 10:07:00 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Tim, re: <Also, I remember (I don't have the facts readily available) that 70% of our population make less than 60,000 of income.>
They need to move to DC where the govmnt takes care of it's own. Last data I saw the average income in DC was $64,000. <g>