Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (58493)	12/31/1999 9:54:00 AM
From: Neal davidson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Why now Greg?

To: Boplicity who wrote (58493)	12/31/1999 9:57:00 AM
From: Sawtooth	Respond to of 152472

<<All QCOM holders should own GSTRF.>> Hello, Greg. I agree re:G; at the very least, those interested in Qcom should understand the basic relationship between The Triumvirate* Qcom - Gstrf - Lor (if they don't, already). Happy New Year! .....VVVVVVVVVVVVV

To: Boplicity who wrote (58493)	12/31/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: Cooters	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

<<All QCOM holders should own GSTRF. >> Gregg, I agree and have been buying throughout this week. They broke through a several year price resistance point in the mid-30's which looked very similar to Q's 72 price point. Cooters

To: Boplicity who wrote (58493)	12/31/1999 10:39:00 AM
From: MileHigh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I like your style! Greg, I'm going to max it out right now for the Jan rally, if it doesn't occur, I dump the trading shares, not the core. MH

To: Boplicity who wrote (58493)	12/31/1999 10:40:00 AM
From: Dealer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Yes greg, I have 15 contracts and bought 100 shares yesterday!!!!

To: Boplicity who wrote (58493)	12/31/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: Nichols	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

RE:GSTRF Greg, I agree. Bought in a real small amount-1% of my port on Monday @33. Ultimately(within the next 3-6 months) want it to make up 3% of my port. That's about all I can do, with QCOM and all. One last thought- anyone have any problem with IDC taking portion of QCOM's royalties? Not well versed, but it seems that they do indeed have some patents there, but they are limited to W-CDMA. They've had extremely limited real world succes, and I believe that they are limited to fixed wireless only.Seems like they are merely riding on coattails of Q- patent play only.Again, I do not see them as a threat(or should I?) but worse-case secenario taking a small % of royalties. \| QCOM will make us a mint, unless some new kid on the block has a better mousetrap(dont see that happening anytime soon). We can't have blinders on and we must diligently watch out for that better mousetrap.