To: Neocon who wrote (69681 ) 1/1/2000 8:40:00 PM From: nihil Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
Powerful analysis, Neocon. I underwent the bootcamp and sniper training in the Old Corps. It is always exaggerated in print and film. It is a powerful, sophisticated process of conditioning. It is almost entirely behavioral rather than intellectual or emotional. During the Korean War, for instance, we were not even told who or why we were supposed to fight. We only knew that we had to protect each other at the gift of our lives. Chesty Puller, CO of the 1st Marines, always referred to the enemy as follows : "Gimme some mo' fire on those people ovuh theah." General Craig on the departure on the First Marine Brigade for Korea said that we would not abandon one single Marine dead or wounded on the field. It was always the command to rescue any wounded or body even if it meant all the rest would die. A ridiculous command. I never knew a Marine who disapproved of it, especially when he crawled outside the wire to patrol. I never heard of a Marine who refused to try the rescue. The esprit d'corps of Marines is almost unmatched in military history. Perhaps the Old Guard ("The Old Guard dies, but does not surrender!). Perhaps Leonidas' Spartans at Thermopylae ("Then we will die in the shade!"). Perhaps the Army of Northern Virginia ("Lee to the rear!"). Perhaps Alexander's Companion Cavalry, or Caesar's Legions, or Belisarius's Cataphracts. Everywhere that men have fought and died that their friends might live, they have died primarily for each other and not for their generals or states or even their families. Unless men make these bonds among themselves, they will refuse to die. It is irrational to die for a stranger, but not to die for a friend or brother. The enemy? The Japs, the gooks, the goonies, the slopes, ... oh, they're not even human. A hundred of them are not worth one of ours. War is hell.