To: rupert1 who wrote (2265 ) 1/2/2000 11:18:00 AM From: Walt Corey Read Replies (1) | Respond to
OT..Vick, don't you ever get tired of this?? I am. I don't believe there is anything more to be said on the subject of netp. Where you've read every last thing I've written on the subject I think you'll see I have been fairly consistent. There are two issues on the table, netp the company and netp the stock price. They are entirely different animals. Did I get swept up in the heady exhuberance of it all at one time..yep, as have lots of people. Did I hope upon hope it would see $70/shr? yep, could have retired right then and there. Instead of seeing $70/shr it saw $10 and I wish I had bought it then instead of when I did. That sad fact has zero to do with it being a good company with a good product. People have accused me of 'reading a book and becoming an expert'. My reading a book, or not reading a book has nothing to do with netp's performance in the market or with it fundamentally. I was not the one that made this personal...you and Frederick and one or two others are. So, am I going to defend myself? You betcha. Even so, personal attacks aren't going to materially effect the price performance of netp or any other stock. As it happens, I made 70% ROI on it, not too shabby, annualized, 140%. I am not complaining , nor would I begrudge anyone getting a higher selling price than $41. Again, don't make this personal. And comments like spitting on a high tension wire to get a signal, or give me hell because I deserve it...yeah, like those are mature comments. This is incredibly boring, aren't you getting bored? To set the record straight for the very last time, I think netp is a very good company, I do not think it's stock price will see $100 or $70 without some incredible manipulation. As far as the raginghormones board, they can't even agree what the Harmon list last yr was, and that can be cut and pasted from his web site...and they have posts like here it is for 2000, netp, netp, netp,netp etc etc. So let's just stop the attacks...OK?
