Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elcasmirb who wrote (21019)	1/2/2000 12:06:00 PM
From: Ironyman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Hint: More than! Regards, Irony Man

To: elcasmirb who wrote (21019)	1/2/2000 4:58:00 PM
From: marianna	Respond to of 34075

hi..u know whats funny...my husband was laughing at me..he said..u still read that thread??? then my son said, that was a big loss of money for u guys...then i said...it's not over yet...and yes i still read the thread every day...i am still convinced that this is ligite...and we will all be rich some day.,,GO TED TURNER....GO MYNG...PROVE THE WORLD WRONG...JUST LIKE THE Y2K HYPE...WE WILL PREVAIL...

To: elcasmirb who wrote (21019)	1/2/2000 6:23:00 PM
From: ge-believer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Elcasmirb, I think this has always been the strategy. You'll recall that the company has said many times over the last year or so that a top spending priority was acquiring adjacent properties. I'm afraid that many did not recognize how vital this was. Of course, the strategy changed because of the SEC trouble. I figure this set us back a year, because it was necessary to spend time and money on the BD report, instead of proceeding with Guido's study alone. On the subject of geologist's studies, am I the only one who believes that interest by the majors demonstrates the validity of GE's various reports? I don't think any mining company, major or otherwise, is going to go across the street, much less to Bolivia, without first having seen some credible studies. Remember, Guido's second study represented the vast majority of the work done at Cangalli. It also was the one that sparked the interest of other mining companies initially, over a year ago. Remember also, no one has ever said that Guido's numbers were wrong.