Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (44399)	1/2/2000 11:14:00 AM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 71178

It was sort of disconcerting, I was in the process of writing to tell you how much I admired the post, when the edit popped up. I still admire the post, but the edit put a flaw in the hard, glossy finish. For the record, here it is when I started to admire it: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Calendars are conventions. Ours is not based on the actual incarnate "manger thing", but on some black robes' abstract and official Best Guess of when that might have happened. Black robes dead a thousand years now. (Or so.) And while research might adjust or correct our understanding of the timing of the nominal calendar-anchoring event, once the calendar receives its imprimatur it rapidly takes on a tremendous inertia. I, being famously inert, couldn't give a toss about New Revelations re agricultural accommodations for putative divine illegitimi. My my my Millennium will arrive "by the numbers" on 01/01/01. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Excellent!