Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Druss who wrote (5836)	1/2/2000 2:12:00 PM
From: DanZ	Respond to of 10293

Druss, I appreciate your opinion, but respectfully disagree with it. Haven't large drug companies had articles withdrawn from publication, or worse rejected? Were they ever able to get another article published? Further, the studies in question were not conducted by Gum Tech, and would not be submitted by Gum Tech. I apologize for being ambiguous in this regard in my last post. The studies would be submitted by the researchers who conducted the studies. Even if you are correct that Gum Tech will forever be blacklisted from every medical journal, I don't see how this would affect the independent researchers from getting their study published. If the results of the studies were inconclusive, Gum Tech would have had to release this to shareholders. The studies were supposed to be completed in October. What do you think has been happening for the last two months? panteon, My apologies for the harsh tone in my reply to you. There is a long history of deception and misinformation concerning Gum Tech on this thread. If you ever get around to looking at Gum Tech's core gum business, I would appreciate hearing your opinions. Best regards and happy New Year. Dan