Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Internet Guru Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KZAP who wrote (3794)	1/4/2000 3:40:00 AM
From: David M. Boerman	Respond to of 4337

Take a look at TSIG and this is the reason why: 10 reasons TSIG will go past $1.00 IMHO 1.The alliance with Coke and the Superbowl.http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/991203/fl_teleser_1.html 2.The alliance with United Cerebral Palsy. Worth a fortune.http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/991203/fl_teleser_1.html 3.Upcoming spot on CNN and World Business Review.I expect a double. biz.yahoo.com 4.Huge alliance with PBS. I expect a huge surge! biz.yahoo.com 5.Mymusiccard.com now the Hot site on Nettaxi.com.!! Watch out Cdnow. MMC is here to stay! 6.Huge deals with local schools across the country beginning to take off. I expect revenues to surge. 7.TSIG has IMO the potential to pop to $1.00 or more with 2 signifigant PRs.Many other Nasdaq stocks pop 400% to the recent 700% of an IPO. 8-10. TSIG has signifigant institutional buying and I undersand several Investment groups are buying in. I personnaly spoke to Paul H. and know the potential of the next month. TSIG should be $1.25 by January 31st and $2.50 -$4.00 by July 2000 IMO. Watch and See. 11. Interview with OTC internet stock.com otcinternetstocks.com This dd was done by dartinger. I'm just posting this for new investors. tsig2000

To: KZAP who wrote (3794)	1/4/2000 8:13:00 AM
From: Mr. Big	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4337

NETP news -->> biz.yahoo.com

To: KZAP who wrote (3794)	1/4/2000 5:45:00 PM
From: Steve Antonelli	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4337

>>>> You're not happy with the picks or the way things have turned out? I wouldn't call the list "underperforming no-names"! <g> They may not be all of what you think they should be, but I sure wouldn't call them "no-names". (at least not four of them) <g> <<<< Here's what should have happened in releasing the list of 10 stocks for 2000. Publish the list to those that wanted to pay on Sunday December 26th in the evening. That would have given those people a chance to do whatever research they needed to do before the market open the following morning. By publishing the list the last week of last year, the inevitable price increase would have occurred then, and not in year 2000. This would have removed the controversy of an easy 23% increase starting off the year on the first day. His 23% one day increase beats the S&P 500 for all of 1999. Anything wrong with that picture? I think so. If he had published the list in 1999, then whatever the portfolio does in 2000 would be valid and not artificailly increased by the one day hype gain. I'm sure he intentionally released his picks to get the biggest possible boost starting off 2000. Regarding his picks, there is nothing wrong with AOL, CMGI, and CNET. RBAK might be a good pick. I would need to research that one in detail first before commenting.