Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (59250)	1/4/2000 9:03:00 AM
From: Boplicity	Respond to of 152472

Thanks, <eom> Greg

To: Voltaire who wrote (59250)	1/4/2000 9:22:00 AM
From: taylorfife	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Voltaire...Thanks for posting your intentions. Looking back at a previous post of yours, as usual, you were right on. Looking forward to the "rest of the story" to unfold. Thanks again. To: jakers12 who wrote (50466) From: Voltaire Tuesday, Nov 16, 1999 7:54 PM ET Reply # of 59255 It is amazing that you get about the same thing I did and I had no idea what you have used. I just did mine with my own technique - if it happens it happens if it does not then so be it but mine is as follows. If people went back to my original formula and then added 1.5 for Scarcity - 163 X 5 + 4 divided 3 X 1.5 = or 163 X 9 = 1467 divided by 3 = 489 X 1.5 = 733 before split after split assuming no more splits - 489 hard factor X 1.5 = 733 again at end of 2000 - you say 2003, 2800 will certainly come before then. oh well, V

To: Voltaire who wrote (59250)	1/4/2000 9:26:00 AM
From: Jenne	Respond to of 152472

What about the 400 price target.. you're selling going into earnings.. hmmmmmm you think maybe Q will be going down from there?