SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (70614)1/4/2000 10:04:00 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I wasn't ridiculing his opinion, I was challenging it. Questioning it. Critiquing it. As it was expressed, a desire that courts demonstrate "sensitivity" to the "religious sentiments of the populace" demonstrates a fundamental misapprehension of the way the law does work, especially with respect to the Constitution.



To: jlallen who wrote (70614)1/4/2000 10:34:00 AM
From: Constant Reader  Respond to of 108807
 
Nasty and personal. And arrogant too. Surprisingly, non-lawyers are entitled to opinions about how they feel the law ought to work. And no lawyer need feel compelled to ridicule those opinions. That's my opinion, of course and responses like those you posted are one reason why non-lawyers hold lawyers in such low regard as a rule.

An excellent description of your own style, and its consequences. Congratulations.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News