SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Windows on Wall Street -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AugustWest who wrote (2029)1/4/2000 10:14:00 AM
From: Ken Adams  Respond to of 2233
 
I just went to that address. There is no mention of a patch for our new version 6.5. I looked around at the site but found nothing about it.

I called them and died on hold (my dime, of course). I just sent them some very polite e-mail explaining that the new version isn't reading data for January 3, 2000.

I'll let all know what comes from that.

Ken



To: AugustWest who wrote (2029)1/4/2000 1:51:00 PM
From: Bob Anderton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2233
 
AugustWest,
This is not much of a help, but I downloaded the 5.0 to 6.5 upgrade with IE 4.0 with no problems, so they are giving you a bum steer on the IE 5.0 requirement. I'm having the same problem everyone else is having of course, with the 6.5 version not reading MS data correctly after 1/1/2000. I read somewhere a disclaimer that they had made that they hadn't yet received the file format that MS Downloader 6.52 was going to use and that's the downloader I use to get data off of Profit Direct in MS format. The big advantage of having data stored in MS format rather than WOW format, to answer a question somebody else asked a while ago, is that almost all other programs will read MS format since it's something of a standard. Nothing else reads WOW format. I learned WOW before I learned MS, so I still am more familiar with WOW syntax. It would be nice if they would get this straightened out.

What format does WOW use to denote 1/3/00? In other words, why does 1/3/2000 come up as some date in 1993? Goofy.

Bob