Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (94965)	1/4/2000 1:11:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Respond to of 186894

Tony - All salient points, IMHO. PB

To: Tony Viola who wrote (94965)	1/4/2000 3:44:00 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

A bit OT, Tony, where do you get your conclusion that Krytech is less reliable than any other machine? Do you have any evidence that tells you this? From an Engineering stand point, there is absolutely nothing which would suggest Krytech systems are less reliable. Comparing the Krytech system to an overcocked system which is running over spec is wrong. The Krytech machine could indeed carry a higher factor of safety and be more reliable from a thermal break down. As far as mechanical reliability of the compressor, it is not possible to judge unless you work for the company and are very familiar with their quality control. Not knowing any detail about the Krytech system, I would have no problem running CAD/CAM applications on it. Of course this argument has nothing to do with AMD Vs. INTC :) Mani