SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Wiggins who wrote (9185)1/4/2000 1:36:00 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 29987
 
Old Stuff...Worth the Read.....
Y2K Is Behind the Satellite Phone Surge

By Neil Winton
Reuters

LONDON (Dec. 17) - Multinational companies are rushing to buy satellite
telephones as last-minute insurance against the millennium computer bug,
company officials said on Friday.

But some industry experts point out that this is unlikely to provide much
immunity because satellite phones have to use ground-based facilities to
complete calls to traditional users.

The sales surge is helping the floundering providers of satellite telephone
services who have invested billions of dollars in space networks but found
sales hard to come by.

Potential customers have been put off by the high cost of telephone handsets
at around $3,000 and calls costing up to $7 a minute.

But worries that everything will go quiet after midnight on December 31 have
prompted companies like information technology giant International Business
Machines Corp and global telecommunications operator AT & T Corp to stock up
on satellite telephones.

The fear is that computers controlling telephone and utility services might
succumb to the so-called Y2K problem. Computers programmed to use double
digit dates like 97 might trip over when faced with the zeros in 2000.

REMOTE AREAS MIGHT BE VULNERABLE

London-based Inmarsat, which had 140,000 subscribers at the end of 1998, said
its sales of Mini-M phones had accelerated over the last few months, but
declined to be more specific.

Privately owned Inmarsat, likely to be floated on stock markets in two years,
said it expected most telephone systems to be immune to the bug, but its
customers operating in remote regions were seeking satellite telephone
backup.

Iridium LLC, forced into bankruptcy last August, said its north American
sales had soared because of Y2K fears. IBM and ATT had signed up for its
products.

``We have seen about a 15 percent surge in sales because of Y2K. We actually
have many more Fortune 100 companies that we can't name. This is an emotional
issue; they simply don't want to alarm their customers,' Iridium North
America spokeswoman Kathie Matney said by telephone from Washington D.C.

Motorola Inc is a major investor in Iridium's 66 low-orbiting satellite
network.

``This action is across the board with customers from telecommunications,
businesses large and small and the health care industry,' Matney said.

She said costs were dropping, with the latest handsets costing close to
$1,000 and calls at $1.50 a minute.

SATELLITE 'PHONES WON'T PROVIDE MUCH IMMUNITY

Jeremy Green, analyst with high-technology consultancy Ovum, thinks that the
sudden embrace of satellite telephones is likely to be pointless.

``Companies getting Iridium phones think they will be more resistant to Y2K.
But who do they think will be on the other end of the phone when they make
the call? That will need ground facilities too and they could be just as
vulnerable to Y2K.'

Green said satellite telephone sales had been disappointing because they were
too expensive and didn't work very well.

``There's also no data service; you can't plug in and send e-mails. Because
they are newer, people thought they'd be better prepared against Y2K. But why
should that apply to Iridium and not to (cellular phone company) Vodafone (
Airtouch),' Green said.



To: David Wiggins who wrote (9185)1/4/2000 8:28:00 PM
From: Shtirlitz  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 29987
 
So why wouldn't G* face the same problems as I* ?
So far I don't see any difference between them.
Customer base for this type of phone service is EXTREMELY limited. This is not the mass market product. Most of the people do not need this VERY expensive service. Cell phone is more than enough.
Can anyone explain me the market for this product?