Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bindusagar Reddy who wrote (30927)	1/4/2000 2:47:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 77400

Not Reddy, despite your determined efforts to prove otherwise, there are many smart Indians. Here's a particularly smart one, Ajay Diwan. The guy covers LU and Cisco for Goldman Sachs. Guess what their (his) pick is in that area? You guessed it, Cisco! (Don't feel too slighted, while LU was passed over, so was its usual companion in that area, NT). Goldman's Favorite Stocks for 2000 cnbc.com And the beat goes on....

To: Bindusagar Reddy who wrote (30927)	1/4/2000 3:00:00 PM
From: Peppe	Respond to of 77400

Get ready for a bad year for Cisco LOL!! CSCO longs have heard this one before. Let's talk in February when CSCO releases Q2 earnings. peppe

To: Bindusagar Reddy who wrote (30927)	1/4/2000 10:17:00 PM
From: bgg	Respond to of 77400

BR -- so you say you see more arrogance among Cisco people than any other thread. It's an obvious given that YOU work for a competitor of Cisco's, but why are you assuming that participants on this thread are by-in-large Cisco employees? Do you assume that any arrogance you see on this thread translates to widespread arrogance throughout Cisco as a company. Talk about sweeping generalizations! I know a few folks who work at Cisco, and when I ask about their success (after thanking them for the tremendous gains) I hear about how seriously the company takes its competitors, how they have compensation largely tied to customer satisfaction, etc, etc. This isn't a arrogant stance. Actually, my definition of arrogance is someone who speaks to people as if his opinions are foregone conclusions. Arrogance is also personified by someone who calls a group of people retards because he feels his opinion is better/superior. You are the most arrogant, and worse yet, two-faced poster I've seen here in a while. First, you bitch and complain that "CSCO people" are arrogant... then, you proceed to color everyone who owns or works for CSCO a "retard." Very nice. I would strongly urge you to shut your mouth the next time you feel the urge to exercise your complete lack of class. And by the way, according to you, we should all sell CSCO because they have fricken competition! Be still my heart! Strong competition is what keeps companies performing and on their toes. Hell, CSCO can get a relatively small bite of some of these new telco/service provider market opportunities, and still kick ass.