SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : CYPB - Cypress BioScience -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BRAVEHEART who wrote (532)2/12/2000 3:04:00 AM
From: tuck  Respond to of 586
 
Jeffrey & Thread,

Wondering how far this could go and what was a good target for CYPB, I began to do some casual digging, and found a few interesting items. I may be reinventing the wheel here, but I have not seen an attempt on this thread at valuing the company. Apologies if I've referenced stuff everyone's seen and digested.

This maybe responsible for some of the action of late:

arthritis.org

Note that Prosorba therapy is the most costly option. I found a figure for the number of patients in the total RA population in CYPB's markets on the company web site:

"Rheumatoid Arthritis is a chronic, often debilitating auto-immune disease in which the body's immune system attacks its own tissue, which can lead to painful inflammation and deformity of the joints. The disease affects more than 2 1/2 million Americans, 70% of them women, most between the ages of 25 and 60. The PROSORBA is targeted toward the over 250,000 patients with the most serious form of the disease." This does not include CYPB's international markets, but a ball park figure could be inferred with a little more digging. Enbrel, though costly, is ~30% cheaper than Prosorba and is in some cases insured. The docs in the above article seem impressed with it, and additional reports of joint protection have recently been announced at a conference. So Prosorba has some competition in its market that will limit its penetration of it. The question is, what is that penetration rate and what will it be? I think we can get clues from revenue data and projections.

Folks, we have enough info to take a stab at valuation, if we care to make the effort. I nibbled already at 2 5/8 a couple of days ago based on thin DD, because of TA, insider buying, ramping volume and diminishing float. I might try to gather up the numbers and run them, try to come up with a fundamental target. Not right now, though, with the after effects of Friday evening setting in.

But what of today's volume spike? Could this article have hit the Street consciousness so recently? I doubt it. It does look like a possible pump starting.

Thanks, Jeffrey for bringing this one to my attention. Maybe you and I and other threadsters can figure out the price at which the dump will start. What do you say?

Cheers, Tuck



To: BRAVEHEART who wrote (532)2/14/2000 1:04:00 PM
From: tuck  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 586
 
Jeffrey,

Hope you haven't gone on one of your long sabbaticals again. Things are just getting interesting.

sec.gov

Dated 2/7/00, this is a 13D about the CEO exercising a gob of options. This creates a potential overhang, as his ownership seems to have jumped more than tenfold, to 7% of outstanding, if I'm reading it correctly. This doesn't seem to be bothering the Street at the moment.

Cheers, Tuck