Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jmanvegas who wrote (59485)	1/4/2000 6:54:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

vegas, Good to hear from you. I have learned to listen to you. Q 156 AH's now, I was a bit early on my buying today, we should fill the gap, nothing fundamental about Q changed AT ALL! Also, I also think Dr J was tired and not amused with the interview. We know it all, these interviews are worthless. Tabloid Jerkalism, no deep discussion about ANYTHING! I hope Dr J takes his team of Dr's and Interns back to the Lab to Kick Some Serious A@# !! Regards, MileHigh PS- The reason I am having fun is because this is the only way to make serious money. But V has got to teach me about Leaps one day.

To: jmanvegas who wrote (59485)	1/4/2000 6:58:00 PM
From: myadd	Respond to of 152472

Right on jmanvegas! ...I bought today..will buy the next and the next if it keeps going down..look to the future and not this little blip on the screen! james

To: jmanvegas who wrote (59485)	1/4/2000 7:06:00 PM
From: linsol	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

CNBC should LISTEN before they report. Wasn't the 1,000 price target for the NEXT 12 MONTHS. That would make it POST SPLIT.

To: jmanvegas who wrote (59485)	1/5/2000 2:03:00 AM
From: cfoe	Respond to of 152472

Q languished for years and came off a multi-year base. Since last February I have recommended QCOM to about half a dozen friends - all of whom are very happy that I did. In speaking to one of these friends recently I realized how this past year's performance lends itself to a distorted view by people like Insana. They see this extraordinary one year performance like someone who discovers an "overnight" movie star. What they neglect in their ignorance is the years of work to get to the point where the star can be and is "discovered." I view QCOM's stock performance this year as five years' of deserved gain compressed into one year. When one looks back at all of the forces that were arrayed against, and tried to suppress, CDMA and QCOM all those years, it is no surprise that the stock price exploded upward once the lid was lifted (ERICY's capitulation). But you hear no talk about that. Why? Maybe because that would take original thought and guys like Insana just read the script that is given them.