Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waverider who wrote (59531)	1/4/2000 8:56:00 PM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

OT FSU 7 VT O

To: waverider who wrote (59531)	1/4/2000 8:58:00 PM
From: Randall Knight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

O.K. everybody. Here is why you must continue to read SI: fool.com Here is my email to the author of the above article: Greetings, I just read your article on rule makers. It was interesting to read about how irresponsible you claim the PW analyst was in his earnings estimates for Qualcomm while at the same time totally misrepresenting Qualcomm's revenue stream. The future earnings growth for Qualcomm will not come from royalties alone. In fact, royalties will comprise only a small fraction of their revenue stream. Their greatest growth will come from ASIC sales. Those are the computer chips that run CDMA phones. In that area Qualcomm is the Intel of wireless. Perhaps your labeling of "irresponsible" was a little off target. Or perhaps you misunderstand what that means too, having written a piece that smacks of it. Randall Knight If you too would like to email the author, here is his email address: TMFOtter@aol.com