Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NWLL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (101)	1/5/2000 12:31:00 AM
From: who cares?	Respond to of 265

Frank, free advice, drop the SSB crap. No one outside the ZSUN thread knows what the hell you're talking about. The rest of the investment world would see SSB as Solomon Smith Barney. Do you really, in your heart of hearts, believe this stock will ever do anything because it's worth a crap and not because it's a daytrader mini mo mo? Damn man, it had nothing to do with the internet until recently, and even now it's iffy, all based on a bunch of hocus pocus projections by people that have a dubious record at that sort of thing. It will have to dilute about 100 bazillion cheap shares to ever be able to afford to be what you dream it will be. It's a joke and you and a few others are either conning, thieving, rubes or you're the guy at the party with the "kick me" sign stuck on your back while everyone else is laughing at you. Wake up. CMB

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (101)	1/5/2000 12:44:00 AM
From: xbrent	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 265

Let us revisit the ZD article. This is a bit humorous. In your post you mention subscribers while the article and the PR talk about users. If you will allow me, I would like to suggest that there is a huge difference between user and subscriber and a huge difference between a personal user and a governmental user. In this case a user is most likely one goverment employee talking with another government employee on govermental time for a govermental purpose. Hardly people at home buying goods and services. Furthermore, and just for discussion purposes,if one thinks about internet use in the United States you need to be wired or connected somehow, and either subscribe or have a free internet service sponsored by advertising. Is there anyone on the planet who thinks that China will be wired or have the infrastructure for wireless and have paid subscribers or free based on advertising anywhere in the lifetimes of most of us? The aforementioned business model(s) have not suceeded in in the US so far let alone third world countries. With that said I just wanted to point out that there is a big difference between a subscriber and a user and an equal major difference between a free maket in a developed country and a largely communist country which is third world in nature.