SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Geoff Goodfellow who wrote (9267)1/5/2000 3:22:00 PM
From: Manx  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29987
 
This (whoever) analyst needs to check the history of the 'QCOM vs. analysts' projections' before opening his/her mouth or write something about G*. Loss of credibility for this, so called analyst---i.e.,when GSTRF recovers fast from a negative statement--- is significant.

Move from a low of 36+ to 42+ was amazing!



To: Geoff Goodfellow who wrote (9267)1/5/2000 4:35:00 PM
From: Rocket Scientist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29987
 
Geoff is the 9505 available yet? And if so, what's the price?

As for the weight, the 375/378 grams you note is correct from the spec sheet, but Mot is a little misleading, I think. I don't believe the cellular cassette weighs 3 grams (0.1 oz). I believe to get from 375 grams to 378, you remove the sat antenna and insert a cassette. If you want a set of parts that's equivalent to a dual mode phone (sat antenna AND cellular cassette), I bet you're back at 450+ grams. (that's one pound, in the US)



To: Geoff Goodfellow who wrote (9267)1/5/2000 5:17:00 PM
From: Red Heeler  Respond to of 29987
 
Geoff,

I won't quibble with you over the weight of the handsets. I consider it to be an insignificant component of the overall picture if the weight disparity among competitors is small. My guess is that, weight notwithstanding, the handset delivering the best value, quality, and speed will get the nod.

CC