SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zoltan! who wrote (12058)1/5/2000 3:59:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
Zoltan,

Because you are unable to provide a valuation for CSCO does not mean that I am incapable of generating or haven't generated a valuation for LU. If you ask nicely, and not in an adversarial tone, I would be happy to share my thoughts with you.

Why must you reduce this discussion to an us vs. them issue?

Odder, yet, is that this discussion grew out comments that I made on this thread that were critical of LU's cash flow.

TTFN,
CTC



To: Zoltan! who wrote (12058)1/5/2000 8:00:00 PM
From: Techplayer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
Zoltan, The difference between LU and Bay or 3com is that CSCO is not beating them up. It is the other way around. LU owns a major % of the space that CCSCO is trying to penetrate. LU revenues have increased from 30 billion 2 years ago to 45-47 projected this year. Does that sound like LU is losing ground?

Brian



To: Zoltan! who wrote (12058)1/6/2000 7:19:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 21876
 
>>Since Chuzzlewit cannot justify LU's price by the methods he prescribes then he should follow that advice and sell LU.

Gee, what a difference 24hrs. makes. Yesterday and today's Chuzz-Mr. Fun/the "Oracle of Nada" colloquy is a classic. I have to add it to my collection.