SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (85290)1/5/2000 8:38:00 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573092
 
John,

the Intel News Network
news.cnet.com

"most notably the Pentium III
450 MHz, and to a lesser extent, the Celeron 400 MHz," Merrill Lynch vice president Steven
Fortuna said in a report in mid-December."

So I would have to believe ML knows what they are talking about.

That had to hurt, huh?

steve



To: Petz who wrote (85290)1/5/2000 8:43:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573092
 
RE:"I didn't even know such a part existed! There are no Floppermines slower than 600 MHz on pricewatch.

Or were they talking about notebook chips, which wouldn't be listed there anyway?

Petz"

They were talking about P-III-450 Katmais (not coppermines) that Intel stopped offering during the quarter.
Charles R. reported right here over a month ago that there was a shortage of low speed chips from Intel. Intel either stopped offering them because they wanted to get ASPs up or they took that fab space away to make way for the Floppermine launch, which as you know was a month or so late and a slow one at that...
Possible that Intel got caught ramping the coppermine at the expense of the lower speed (Katmai) chips which created a vacuum. When they realized they still needed the Katmai they eliminated/(got tight with) the lower speed grades as a business decision.
Jim

Jim



To: Petz who wrote (85290)1/5/2000 8:49:00 PM
From: niceguy767  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Hi John:

Not too many PWeeIII's above 600 either, it seems!