Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (85365)	1/5/2000 11:57:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572204

Re: "EP, first AMD met its requirements to its OEMs this quarter....so apparently Dresden production wasn't needed. In the meantime Sanders in his November CC stated when Dresden would begin shipping. Of course you already know that." I know that AMD originally promised Dresden production in '98, but of course you knew that too. As for AMD meeting their commitments, they could have committed to FAR more if the troubled Dresden fab was capable of producing production material. It's not (why?) so AMD must ration the Austin fab capacity. Yes they met their drastically constrained commitments. Why aren't you asking what the hell's going on? Dresden isn't sitting there for free. It's burning money big time but you AMDroids don't even have the guts to ask why. It's called DENIAL and you have a major case of it. EP Dresden.... A year late and nobody even dares ask why.....