SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (85427)1/6/2000 1:30:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572336
 
PB re <<I may have said "on or ahead". That's still fair, i.e., in the range.>>

NO! You said that Intel was ahead of schedule in the coppermine ramp. Now (couple of post ago), you said they are "on track". There is a difference. I dig it up if you make it worth my time.

Mani



To: Process Boy who wrote (85427)1/6/2000 2:29:00 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572336
 
Anyway, the GTW problem evidently has nothing to do with the Coppermine ramp.

PB, how did you get to that conclusion?

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News