SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (60022)1/6/2000 10:00:00 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
OT....Hole in One...the Long Shot....
Into the Canyon?

Mars Polar Lander May
Have Crashed in Huge
Hole on Red Planet

With its solar arrays spread and the
lander nestled inside, the probe was to
delve into a neighboring world. For an
idea of the craft's size, the heat shield at
the bottom is 7.9 feet in diameter. (NASA)

The Associated Press
D E N V E R, Jan. 6 ? The vanished Mars Polar
Lander probably broke apart in a canyon,
The Denver Post reported today, citing
scientists who suggested the landing site
was the reason for NASA?s latest failure.
The $165 million lander was supposed to
touch down Dec. 3 for a 90-day mission to
analyze the planet?s atmosphere and search for
frozen water beneath its south pole. It has not
been heard from since it started its descent after
an 11-month cruise, and NASA has not offered a
reason for the disappearance.
Members of the Lockheed Martin team who
maneuvered the craft to Mars believe a canyon
nearly a mile deep and 6 miles wide in some
places was the landing site, the Post reported,
citing an unidentified source at the aeronautics
company who was on the mission team.

Orbiter Burned Up
The source relied on ?probable? landing
coordinates posted online by NASA and its Jet
Propulsion Laboratory. Lab officials
acknowledged that they knew the canyon was in
the area.
?We believe we landed in a region that was in
the vicinity (of the canyon), but we have no way
of knowing whether it hit those slopes,? said
Daniel McCleese, the Mars Surveyor Program
scientist at JPL.
The loss of the lander came less than three
months after bungled communications between
Lockheed and JPL caused the Mars Climate
Orbiter to burn up in the Martian atmosphere.

Who Knew?
Lockheed scientists were reportedly surprised to
learn that the canyon was inside the lander?s
projected landing zone. During the mission,
Lockheed scientists steered the craft under JPL
direction.
?No one on our side knew that canyon was
there,? the Lockheed source told the Post. ?All of
the sudden, two weeks later, we got this MOLA
data? ? topographical maps and images ? ?and
it was like, ?Look at that hole!??
McCleese said mission scientists believed the
south polar region offered ?some of the safest
places on Mars.?
However, he said, the planet is covered with
craters and canyons and it is impossible to
remotely place a spacecraft at a precise location.
He also said JPL scientists couldn?t find a single
landing zone on the planet?s generally smooth
south pole without a hazard.



To: Boplicity who wrote (60022)1/6/2000 10:09:00 AM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
check out this: beats a quote about reddish stool
LBstocks quoted on Qualcomm ditty, what a scream

cbs.marketwatch.com

man oh man, am I proud

I aint even watching the damned quote this morning
too predictable, too weird, not worth the energy
I dont expect so much media bullshit as VoltMan
but I do already see much talk about "three Fed hikes"
biggest risk to spring/summer: Fed hikes when economy slows some

we will probably close about 161-163 after some grinding
I want to see higher daily lows as we proceed to weekend

something about the word "grinding" I like
it can be good, it can be bad
/ Jim