Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Casaubon who wrote (36888)	1/6/2000 6:47:00 PM
From: bobby beara	Respond to of 99985

C, no i don't recall, that, i re-read Mr. Hoopes post a couple of times, despite his somewhat unconventional snake in the box he seems to be a stickler for detail. I think the 100% post basically means he doesn't know the downside target. We have got a hell of a teepee going in the nasdaq here and if qcom gaps down on the open we will have that island reversal. It would seem this would be the way that it would end with posts being in the double digits daily on the stock thread. Another part of the psychology here I believe is the discord on this thread that has a distinct bearish leaning, and the comparison in posting #'s lately to the q thread. At the April nutz top Doug R leveled a scathing attack at the bears, we have had over a month long of attacks that drove Sew away and caused LG to abandon the original thesis of the thread and rename it, and then on a grander scale of theatre Wall St., Dudac's unceremonious dumping from the elves list, dunce cap and all. Indeed the bears are the most wrong at the top. I wonder how the bulls were treated in 1982. The bulls are still thumping their chests, this could get ugly before we bottom and get some fear in the air. b