Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/6/2000 5:36:00 PM
From: Al's Fun	Respond to of 5195

That would be great news is IDC went on the NASDC.....great news....I hope you are right...

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/6/2000 5:57:00 PM
From: Yak-attack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5195

ok whatever, I don't care, I road this stock from 15 bucks to 70, I am done with it, now your left with my poop. peace

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/6/2000 7:25:00 PM
From: Raj Ramaswamy	Respond to of 5195

Darrell, Excellent report. I am not a telecom expert, but I do understand the day trading mentality of some people. Nothing wrong with that. Such people should stick with stock price as opposed to fundementals. Let the dust settle. I bet analyst or two will issue a very favorable report especially after ERCY case is settled (early Feb/march ?). Raj

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/6/2000 7:53:00 PM
From: JP Sullivan	Respond to of 5195

Excellent brief, Darrell! Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. BTW, are you the same Darrell whose posts I used to read on the IOM thread? Great stuff, as usual :) Winston

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/6/2000 10:58:00 PM
From: kami	Respond to of 5195

Darrell.. Excellent post! Thanks. You answered to many questions that I had. Question: does IDC have partnership agreement with US semiconductor MFGS? IDC is more in research & development and they have many patents pendings that need to be practically implemented or tested; so, do you think this requires some kind of contract or partnership with manufacturers before turning over to licensee or interest party?

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/6/2000 11:53:00 PM
From: coyote	Respond to of 5195

excellent retort Darrell

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/7/2000 12:45:00 AM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5195

<< GSM and PDC are both TDMA brands >> GSM is not a TDMA "brand", and although based on TDMA it has an entirely different standards body (ETSI v, UWC), a much more robust and evolved 2G specification (phsae 2+), and has been doing data as well as voice since commercially launched in 1992. TDMA, no data. - Eric -

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3123)	1/7/2000 7:26:00 AM
From: Jim Lurgio	Respond to of 5195

Darrell, As usual great post and I'm sure all the investors appreciate the technical areas you leaned on.