Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pan American Silver Corp (PAA-T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: charred who wrote (335)	1/6/2000 9:43:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 358

Charred, I agree that this Russian problem is hurting PAA... However, I think they will go trhough it and have a one year delay or so... But there is no guarantee. Yes Colorada is a very good project... coming in production in the next quarter, I believe... reserves are good and production will be of 4.5M ounces per year at a cost of $2.50-$3.00 if I remember well. I would not take PAA for BAY..for sure... I think Coeur is the better suitor as they have the cash and are also operating a heap leaching silver operation at Rochester. Anyway I look... I can't see a better silver play than BAY.