SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (60596)1/7/2000 10:20:00 AM
From: MileHigh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Greg, re JDSU, I almost think it has better prospects for better returns going forward (as compared to Q). That is, $1 invested in JDSU at the beginning of the year will be worth more than $1 invested in Q, not negative on Q, just think JDSU might outperform...

MileHigh/Q #1, JDSU #2...



To: Boplicity who wrote (60596)1/7/2000 10:20:00 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Greg just love it: everybody trying to get back into Q @ the
same time though the same door, gg.
I made my move yesterday:sold JDSU at 161 and bought Q at
143 with it,

TA



To: Boplicity who wrote (60596)1/7/2000 10:30:00 AM
From: allen menglin chen  Respond to of 152472
 
OT, Greg, I'm reading all your great posts. JDSU recovered fast, probably among the group of great stocks that closest to the 52-wk high. Buy my first JDSU @ 160 -- way too late to the party! Will buy more every 20 pts down. I see some blocks buying in the 155-160 range.
Sorry, post this on the wrong thread.
Allen



To: Boplicity who wrote (60596)1/7/2000 10:43:00 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Greg...no answer necessary...But my gut tells me you would have called a top if the slings and arrows were not at the ready....................
gotta get you some dungarees
<g>



To: Boplicity who wrote (60596)1/7/2000 10:52:00 AM
From: Voltaire  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Yes Greg,

what I really meant to say is after things stabilized, we would have a pullback around the hours I mentioned, still look for one.

V