Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: engineer who wrote (4895)	1/7/2000 12:30:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13582

engineer: Your news is good news. And I greatly respect your knowledge and opinions. No I did not remember that the Chinese were pushing Ericsson to get with CDMA. Do you think this had an impact on their decision to buy the Q's infrastructure division and settle with the Q generally? If it wouldn't be too much trouble, could you give me a little closer estimate of the time period for posts on this subject, or best a link or two. Know you are a very busy person, so if anyone else remembers, would appreciate help from any source on this. Sadly I am not yet convinced that the head man in Sweden who fought the Q using tactics fair (don't remember any) and foul (remember plenty of those) or others in the Ericsson bloated system have any willingness to push CDMA. Will believe it when I see it. Perhaps this just reflects observation of the Ericsson tactics over many years (which seemed to this observer - just IMO - to be as close to bordering on unethical as I have seen in years), that makes me skeptical. I know "religious" conversions happen, but not convinced that Ericsson is a "born again CDMAer". Best. Chaz PS And I even have my doubts re Nokia, though I respect the management there for their ability otherwise.