SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (58102)1/7/2000 1:20:00 PM
From: CpsOmis  Respond to of 95453
 
Slider: <<< I swear on my mothers life - I am not posting to you on Yahoo here, and those posts you posted today were not mine; hopefully that will settle that. >>>

1) You've lied openly before, how can we trust you now?

2) Glad to know you have a mother! Thought maybe you were found in a cave and raised by wolves......

3) (VBG)

4) Got LU?

5) Thanks for having a sense of humor big guy....

CPS



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (58102)1/7/2000 2:12:00 PM
From: SargeK  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Slider on the Blab - You just will not learn!

Slider: "One of three scenario's have taken place - per your own prior comments.

1. I have shorted FGH since the double digits and made a small fortune

2. I have "pimped" FGH's price down - so I could buy lower; perhaps I did - $6 5/16ths - $6 7/8ths & don't need to add over $6 7/8ths...?

3. I am not following FGH at all, playing UFAB as I mentioned earlier - and have an even larger % gain & just posted the FGH commentary to see you slobber & spit all over yourself & to know those chubby, stubby little fingers couldn't hit that keyboard running fast enough; once you read my comments on "buying" FGH..."

Link ONE post where SargeK has said you were shorting.

Link ONE post where SargeK said you were pimping the stock down to 6 5/16. I can provide a link to where YOU stated you would catch FGH one-handed at 4 7/8.

You can't link the posts you cite; because they DON'T exist.
As usual you are up to your same obvious and quite amateurish tricks of attempting to re-write the script. Now you are suggesting you bought in the lower range - cite ONE post prior to that event proving it. You were not reticent about MEXP, why would anyone believe you now?

You obviously enjoy my presence on this board. I am trying to go back to research; but, I WILL NOT let you mischaracterize the events as they have occurred. I WILL stay as long as is needed to prevent this from happening along with a LONG LIST of Slider posts to substantiate any point I wish to debate.

You can stop this now or I will bury your young a.., again!

SargeK