Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (85817)	1/7/2000 3:27:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572644

Re: "EP, since you were the first to bring up this hypothesis which seems to fly in the face of what GTW, the analysts and the media are saying, why don't you show evidence that Intel did meet its commitments to GTW?" If you can't prove you didn't commit a crime then you must be guilty, is that it here on this thread? Only if you are Intel. You guys live by "reality by consensus". So do I take this as an admission that you can't find any statement from GTW that Intel failed to meet it's commitments? Here's what I have found to the contrary: dailynews.yahoo.com "Intel had said earlier in the fourth quarter that it expected demand to be strong in the fourth quarter, which is the PC industry's strongest. It said demand was strong for all many of its products, including its Pentium III and Celeron processors, as well as chipsets. As the quarter progressed, Intel officials said they were meeting customer demand. But that statement did not include additional, or ``upside,' requests from PC makers for additional Intel components." EP